You can take part in the sessions online or by phone. The
sessions started last week and run till the end of November; dates and instructions for how to register are available here.
Photo by James Fehon |
Due to changes brought in by the federal government as part
of last year’s Omnibus Bill C38, the NEB now gets to decide who can – and cannot
– take part in the hearings, and what ‘level’ of participation members of the
public will be allowed. You can read
more about what we expect from the process in this background briefing, and
this presentation by the NEB.
In the application to participate, people will be asked to
show either that they are ‘directly affected’, or have ‘relevant information or
expertise’. We won’t know exactly how the NEB will interpret these requirements
until the process is underway, but it’s a key question to raise in the
information sessions.
If you don’t live on the pipeline route, will you be
excluded from participating because you are not considered ‘directly affected’?
We all have a stake in how our resources are developed, and we will all be directly
affected by the impacts of climate change. We believe that everyone who cares
about this issue and wants to take the time to get involved should be allowed
to have their say – not be potentially excluded by the NEB, or simply put off
by an over-complicated, burdensome application process.
Once Kinder Morgan files their application, likely some time
in December this year, there will be a very short window of time for the public
to apply to participate. We at GSA, alongside many other environmental groups,
will be providing information and support to anyone who wants to get involved.
But because of the short time-frame, it’s important to prepare now.
So please do sign
up for one of the NEB information sessions, and let us know what you think –
and how we can help you claim your right to have your voice heard.
I think that it is important to submit an application because "directly affected" could be defined in many different ways. Examples could include: parents with children in schools located near the proposed pipeline, pipelines crossing aquifers that affect water supply to communities etc. I am assuming that the Georgia Strait Alliance could apply as an intervener as a non-profit organization.
ReplyDelete