Why a polarized and non-transparent debate will hurt the future of Vancouver’s treasured waterfront hub
Years ago, someone came up with the idea of putting vegetables on concrete mixers to drive them around Vancouver, and guess what, it is working. Granted, the trucks aren’t used to bring veggies to market—quite the opposite: the larger-than-life ads depicting carrots and asparagus on cement trucks bring Granville Island’s public market to people’s attention and have become a familiar and endearing sight around the city. The trucks belong to the Ocean Concrete/Lehigh Hanson plant that is located right next to the market and keeps the island’s industrial heritage alive.Ocean Concrete's cement plant is one of the last remaining industrial facilities on Granville Island Photo: Joe Mabel (licensed under GNU Free Documentation License) |
The marketing folks behind the ads knew how to make people pause and think. Their campaign encapsulates
what makes Granville Island so special: it’s a place, in the middle of the city,
where unusual things come together—like the public market, a cement plant, an
arts school campus, theatres, galleries and other creative spaces, a next-door fishing
harbour, and much more. The symbiosis of all these facilities is what has made
Granville Island so popular with locals and international travelers alike.
Now the island is bracing for change. Emily
Carr University is moving away to its new campus in East Vancouver, and the
conversation about the future of the area has started to take off. In February,
the Vancouver Sun’s Daphne Bramham suggested that Granville
Island was in need of re-imagination and renewal to inject new life, creative
energy and local flavour.
Recently, the conversation has taken a much
more antagonistic turn. News leaked that Port Metro Vancouver was negotiating to
take over Granville Island from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation. This
was not well received by everyone, including the City of Vancouver, who according
to a statement by Mayor Gregor Robertson would like to see a “transfer or lease to the City, or
the creation of an independent local authority” to run the island.
There are two things that concern me about
the place we’ve suddenly found ourselves in as we are talking about the future
of Granville Island:
First, it didn’t take long for the debate to be framed around camps, positions, antagonists, and strong
conclusions about what’s right or wrong. Arguments about whether the Port has a
“proven
track record of running things” or represents a bureaucracy
that Granville Island must be saved from provide easily combustible fuel
for a heated discussion, but they are unlikely to produce good outcomes for the
larger community.
Granville Island is a core part of the
waterfront in Vancouver, a maritime city that owes much of its allure and
prosperity to its connection to the ocean and the world. Consequently, the Port
and the shipping industry should be part of this conversation. But so should citizens
and other stakeholders—which leads me to my second concern.
The secrecy surrounding the negotiations
and the lack of transparency and engagement in the process so far do not bode well for
the discussion moving forward. Granville Island arguably plays an important
role for Vancouver: as a public space, a tourist destination, and a source of
diverse economic and job opportunities in the city centre. So all those who
make Granville Island what it is and who want to contribute to and benefit form
it in the future need to be involved: tenants, the City, industry, civil
society, and citizens.
Photo: Ruocaled/Flickr (licensed under CC BY 2.0) |
Divisive debates are not going to get us
there. The way to innovative solutions that benefit us all is through engagement, open dialogue, and collaboration, which is the approach Georgia Strait Alliance is taking with our
Waterfront Initiative. We are
the backbone organization for a growing network of partners and stakeholders
that works to restore, protect, and revitalize Vancouver’s shoreline. Our goal
is to ensure that the waterfront can continue to be a place where we live,
work, play, travel, connect with and protect nature—in other words, all that
Granville Island represents so unmistakably in the heart of the city.
As a resident of Crescent Beach, another waterfront community, I find myself wary of anything run by Port Metro Vancouver. The reason is simple. We are overwhelmed by coal trains these days and PMV is telling us that its OK for Surrey Fraser Docks to add more capacity to ship US thermal coal off to Asia because it means more jobs for BC. Well, it means 25 jobs and as one local resident quipped "just open a couple more coffee shops at the beach and you will create 25 jobs". Our issues are not just local, although noise and air quality are more immediately local; but most importantly the effect on global GHG emissions is larger than our local issues with coal trains. Thermal coal is burned to create electricity and is adding directly to anthropogenic global warming. Is PMV responsible for global warming? Of course not, but it isn't responsive to public sentiment on this issue and probably won't be responsive to public participation in deciding what to do with the 'Island', either. Be wary.
ReplyDelete